Movie Review: DNA (2025)

“DNA” (2025) presents a disturbing and thought-provoking premise rooted in the exploitation of medical science — particularly in the domain of childbirth and genetic manipulation. It attempts to blend a socially relevant theme with mainstream thriller elements. The result is a movie with a bold narrative foundation but an uneven execution.

— Plot & Concept

Plot & Concept

At the heart of DNA lies a highly sensitive and timely issue — the commercialization and, in some cases, criminal misuse of childbirth technologies. The story boldly explores how scientific advancements, while miraculous in intent, can be twisted into dark illegal operations. This sets up a compelling core plot that’s refreshingly different from regular Tamil thrillers.

However, what could have been a razor-sharp investigative thriller loses some of its edge due to screenplay missteps. The first 15 minutes offer an intriguing prologue that hints at a later twist — a move that seasoned viewers might easily predict, which somewhat reduces its impact.

—

Performances

Atharvaa takes the lead as a brooding, emotionally scarred protagonist — a role he’s been associated with in recent films. While he brings intensity to the screen, there’s a sense of repetition in his portrayal of the angry, alcoholic young man. Fortunately, he is rescued by the strength of the central story, which gives him room to explore deeper emotions.

The supporting cast, including the antagonist, is well-chosen. Interestingly, the villain isn’t painted as pure evil, which adds a layer of realism and moral complexity. It’s refreshing to see a gray-shaded character in place of the stereotypical heartless villain.

—Screenplay & Direction

Screenplay & Direction

One of the major drawbacks of DNA is its screenplay structure. After a gripping start, the narrative loses momentum with an unnecessary detour into the protagonist’s romantic past — a breakup subplot that adds little value and feels stretched. This entire portion — around 30 minutes — dilutes the pace and distracts from the film’s main subject.

The final act is rushed, with key sequences bundled together without sufficient buildup. There’s a lack of coherence in how the climax unfolds, making the resolution feel hurried and less impactful than it could have been.

If the film had dedicated more time to build tension around the central crime — much like how Gautham Vasudev Menon did in Yennai Arindhaal, where the focus remained deeply rooted in the protagonist’s world and mission — DNA could’ve reached another level in terms of cinematic grip and emotional weight.

—

Commercial Elements & Missed Opportunities

The inclusion of typical commercial elements like exaggerated fight scenes, forced heroism, and melodramatic moments feels out of place in a story that thrives on subtlety and realism. These crowd-pleasing segments might appeal to a section of the audience, but they dilute the seriousness of the plot and make the film feel disjointed.

The film would have greatly benefited from a more grounded, investigative tone with fewer distractions. With tighter editing and a focus on building suspense, DNA could have easily become a cult thriller in Tamil cinema.

—

Verdict

DNA (2025) is a bold and timely thriller that deserves appreciation for its unique concept and socially relevant message. Despite its flaws in pacing, screenplay, and commercial compromises, the film holds your attention and sparks conversation. If you enjoy thrillers with a dark twist and are willing to overlook a few narrative bumps, this film is definitely worth a watch.

—

Final Thoughts:

Not quite a blockbuster, but certainly a conversation-starter. “DNA” dares to touch themes many shy away from — it just needed a sharper scalpel.